<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ACTION POINT with Cynthia Black</title>
	<atom:link href="http://actionpointonline.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://actionpointonline.com</link>
	<description>"Solution Politics" LIVE Talk Radio-- Sundays, 11A-2P PDT-- 1480 KPHX, simulcast on 1190 KNUV, Phoenix, AZ   AND  Live Streaming show daily on BlogTalkRadio</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on SHOW: 11-16-2008 by Sandra Wilsak</title>
		<link>http://actionpointonline.com/2008/11/16/show-11-16-2008/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Wilsak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actionpointonline.com/?p=1707#comment-863</guid>
		<description>The 60 minutes show must have shown clips from the movie/video "Who Killed the Electric Car". It was a very informative video. I don't think any corporation should get a bailout unless we put very strict regulations and oversight with all loopholes sealed tight. I do understand the need to try to save the auto industry because of the great number of jobs involved. I feel better about this than the banks and investment corporations which gambled and lost. Most gamblers have to live with their losses - not get bonuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 60 minutes show must have shown clips from the movie/video &#8220;Who Killed the Electric Car&#8221;. It was a very informative video. I don&#8217;t think any corporation should get a bailout unless we put very strict regulations and oversight with all loopholes sealed tight. I do understand the need to try to save the auto industry because of the great number of jobs involved. I feel better about this than the banks and investment corporations which gambled and lost. Most gamblers have to live with their losses - not get bonuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Palin Praying with &#8216;Witch Hunter&#8217; by T602</title>
		<link>http://actionpointonline.com/2008/10/06/palin-praying-with-witch-hunter/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>T602</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actionpointonline.com/?p=1217#comment-314</guid>
		<description>Cynthia- I was looking for info about Jeff Farias and came across some horrible posts about you and Jeff on voiceofarizona.com, you should both sue the poster named demsalwayslie. 
The site is a hate site full of slurs.
Please look into this- and bring back Jeff!
Thanks much !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynthia- I was looking for info about Jeff Farias and came across some horrible posts about you and Jeff on voiceofarizona.com, you should both sue the poster named demsalwayslie.<br />
The site is a hate site full of slurs.<br />
Please look into this- and bring back Jeff!<br />
Thanks much !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BAILOUT/RESCUE LINKS by Bailout &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bailout /Rescue Links</title>
		<link>http://actionpointonline.com/2008/10/01/bailoutrescue-links/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Bailout &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bailout /Rescue Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actionpointonline.com/?p=1177#comment-261</guid>
		<description>[...] An intersting collection of analysis articles: Bailout : “A Gun Pointed at Their Head”.[Continue Reading] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An intersting collection of analysis articles: Bailout : “A Gun Pointed at Their Head”.[Continue Reading] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PBS Poll: Is Palin &#8220;Qualified&#8221; for VP?! by Pbs Poll: is Palin “Qualified” For Vp?!</title>
		<link>http://actionpointonline.com/2008/09/22/pbs-poll-is-palin-qualified-for-vp/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Pbs Poll: is Palin “Qualified” For Vp?!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actionpointonline.com/?p=1100#comment-178</guid>
		<description>[...] Hmmm…there were not enough options beneath “No”. Like “Hell, no” or ” Hell, NO Way” and so on… “Do you think Sarah Palin is qualified to serve as Vice President of the United States? NOW . Poll &#124; PBS.”[Continue Reading] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hmmm…there were not enough options beneath “No”. Like “Hell, no” or ” Hell, NO Way” and so on… “Do you think Sarah Palin is qualified to serve as Vice President of the United States? NOW . Poll | PBS.”[Continue Reading] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Brad Blog by Gary Baumgarten</title>
		<link>http://actionpointonline.com/2008/09/17/the-brad-blog/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Baumgarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actionpointonline.com/?p=1056#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Brad Friedman will be my guest Tuesday September 23 at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online.

To talk to Friedman please go to www.garybaumgarten.com and click on the Join The Show link. There is no charge.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad Friedman will be my guest Tuesday September 23 at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online.</p>
<p>To talk to Friedman please go to <a href="http://www.garybaumgarten.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.garybaumgarten.com</a> and click on the Join The Show link. There is no charge.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Palin&#8211; Aerial Hunting of Wolves in Alaska by Why Does Sarah Palin Hate God’s Creatures - Palin, Sarah? &#124; Sarah Palin - Sharpy News</title>
		<link>http://actionpointonline.com/2008/08/30/palin-aerial-hunting-of-wolves-in-alaska/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Does Sarah Palin Hate God’s Creatures - Palin, Sarah? &#124; Sarah Palin - Sharpy News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actionpointonline.com/?p=550#comment-113</guid>
		<description>[...] Alaska state laws allowing bounty hunting were repealed in 1984, but why would Sarah let a little thing like State law stop her from using her divine power as Governor t...? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alaska state laws allowing bounty hunting were repealed in 1984, but why would Sarah let a little thing like State law stop her from using her divine power as Governor t&#8230;? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Palin&#8211; Aerial Hunting of Wolves in Alaska by Annette</title>
		<link>http://actionpointonline.com/2008/08/30/palin-aerial-hunting-of-wolves-in-alaska/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Annette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actionpointonline.com/?p=550#comment-105</guid>
		<description>I have to admit that watching videos of this practice turns my stomach, but there would surely be consequences to many animal species, including wolves and humans, if effective wildlife management practices were banned. Let us not forget what happened in this country when horse slaughter was banned. The resulting surplus of horses has resulted in plummeting horse values, and horses being abandoned and neglected in record numbers. Now, perfectly healthy and well trained horses are selling at auction for less than $200, and some are being purchased by kill buyers for shipment to Mexico where there are no industry controls, and the barbaric cruelty being employed is beyond this writer’s imagination. I would have to say that there has never been a worse time to be a horse in this country. These are the unintended consequences of well meaning animal activists that failed to look at the big picture.

Before anyone starts sending hate mail, please hear me out. Wolves and bears are top line predators, meaning that there are no natural predators to control their numbers. If you love animals, you must think about the consequences to other animal species if they are allowed to overpopulate in any given area. In a worst case scenario, disaster ensues for the overpopulated predator species as well. When their natural food sources become scarce, they will savage and prey on not only each other, but humans and domestic animals as well. 

Aerial management may seen unfair and barbaric, but consider the alternative that was used before airplanes were available. They were poisoned with strychnine baits. Poisoning likely affected non targeted species as well - such as eagles.

Alaska has attempted other management methods in the past. See: http://www.wc.adfg.state.ak.us/management/control/predator_management.pdf 

Now let us discuss the impact of these predator species on humans. There seems to be a misconception that managing the population of these species is merely an attempt to preserve moose and caribou for sport hunting. On the contrary, the very lives and existence of approximately 16% of Alaska’s populaton is at stake. These are the native tribes that have depended on wild game as their main source of sustenance for thousands of years. It’s not like they can become vegetarians in these regions. I might argue that the continued existence of rural native Alaskan people is at far greater risk than the wildlife.

Taken from http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=5791&#38;page=36 :

“The first humans in the Western Hemisphere are believed to have come from Asia across the Beringian land bridge into Alaska 12,000-15,000 years ago.” It is their home, too. For those that argue that the problem is simply too many humans in Alaska rather than too many wolves and bears, let me point out that there are approximately 635,000 residents or about 1.1 persons per square mile - in an area that is twice the size of Texas and one fifth the size of the lower 48 states. In the lower 48, there are approximately 79 people per square mile. Plenty of elbow room! The state’s population ranks 47th in the nation. “Human activities have had less effect on the ecosystems of Alaska than elsewhere in the United States. Conversion of land to agricultural use has been minimal, as is the extent of land alteration through mining and petroleum development.” 

My conclusion: Perhaps you don’t care about the tribes of people who are the last remaining ancestors of the “First Americans”. Do you not care about all of the other animal species at stake when bears and wolves overpopulate? Is there no concern for livestock, dogs, cats, and human children that are attacked when these predators are allowed to diminish too much wild game in a given area? And finally, have you no concern for the affect on the wolves, themselves, when they overpopulate? Aside from them preying on each other when food sources become scarce, it leads to a natural progression of disease and starvation among them. 

Posted by Bronco in the Daily Interlake: “The waxing and waning of species populations are regulated by nature and she seems heartless and cruel in her choices at times. Forget romantic notions of her preserving only the animals we hold dear and erasing the invasive and ugly ones. Fish and game management agencies throughout the country have been employing well thought out agendas that have led to game populations that exceed those before we set foot here hundreds of years ago. Those agencies have people in them who are concerned for our wildlife, not butchers who rejoice in their deaths. It’s unfortunate for the wolves, I agree. They are beautiful, intelligent, animals that mate for life and have strong family values. But left to propagate unattended they will follow the course of all species who find their numbers swelled to overpopulation. Mother nature introduces disease and starvation.” 

Before we jump on the bandwagon and condemn the people of Alaska while sitting at computers in our urban homes, let us educate ourselves about the issues first</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that watching videos of this practice turns my stomach, but there would surely be consequences to many animal species, including wolves and humans, if effective wildlife management practices were banned. Let us not forget what happened in this country when horse slaughter was banned. The resulting surplus of horses has resulted in plummeting horse values, and horses being abandoned and neglected in record numbers. Now, perfectly healthy and well trained horses are selling at auction for less than $200, and some are being purchased by kill buyers for shipment to Mexico where there are no industry controls, and the barbaric cruelty being employed is beyond this writer’s imagination. I would have to say that there has never been a worse time to be a horse in this country. These are the unintended consequences of well meaning animal activists that failed to look at the big picture.</p>
<p>Before anyone starts sending hate mail, please hear me out. Wolves and bears are top line predators, meaning that there are no natural predators to control their numbers. If you love animals, you must think about the consequences to other animal species if they are allowed to overpopulate in any given area. In a worst case scenario, disaster ensues for the overpopulated predator species as well. When their natural food sources become scarce, they will savage and prey on not only each other, but humans and domestic animals as well. </p>
<p>Aerial management may seen unfair and barbaric, but consider the alternative that was used before airplanes were available. They were poisoned with strychnine baits. Poisoning likely affected non targeted species as well - such as eagles.</p>
<p>Alaska has attempted other management methods in the past. See: <a href="http://www.wc.adfg.state.ak.us/management/control/predator_management.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.wc.adfg.state.ak.us/management/control/predator_management.pdf</a> </p>
<p>Now let us discuss the impact of these predator species on humans. There seems to be a misconception that managing the population of these species is merely an attempt to preserve moose and caribou for sport hunting. On the contrary, the very lives and existence of approximately 16% of Alaska’s populaton is at stake. These are the native tribes that have depended on wild game as their main source of sustenance for thousands of years. It’s not like they can become vegetarians in these regions. I might argue that the continued existence of rural native Alaskan people is at far greater risk than the wildlife.</p>
<p>Taken from <a href="http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=5791&amp;page=36" rel="nofollow">http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=5791&amp;page=36</a> :</p>
<p>“The first humans in the Western Hemisphere are believed to have come from Asia across the Beringian land bridge into Alaska 12,000-15,000 years ago.” It is their home, too. For those that argue that the problem is simply too many humans in Alaska rather than too many wolves and bears, let me point out that there are approximately 635,000 residents or about 1.1 persons per square mile - in an area that is twice the size of Texas and one fifth the size of the lower 48 states. In the lower 48, there are approximately 79 people per square mile. Plenty of elbow room! The state’s population ranks 47th in the nation. “Human activities have had less effect on the ecosystems of Alaska than elsewhere in the United States. Conversion of land to agricultural use has been minimal, as is the extent of land alteration through mining and petroleum development.” </p>
<p>My conclusion: Perhaps you don’t care about the tribes of people who are the last remaining ancestors of the “First Americans”. Do you not care about all of the other animal species at stake when bears and wolves overpopulate? Is there no concern for livestock, dogs, cats, and human children that are attacked when these predators are allowed to diminish too much wild game in a given area? And finally, have you no concern for the affect on the wolves, themselves, when they overpopulate? Aside from them preying on each other when food sources become scarce, it leads to a natural progression of disease and starvation among them. </p>
<p>Posted by Bronco in the Daily Interlake: “The waxing and waning of species populations are regulated by nature and she seems heartless and cruel in her choices at times. Forget romantic notions of her preserving only the animals we hold dear and erasing the invasive and ugly ones. Fish and game management agencies throughout the country have been employing well thought out agendas that have led to game populations that exceed those before we set foot here hundreds of years ago. Those agencies have people in them who are concerned for our wildlife, not butchers who rejoice in their deaths. It’s unfortunate for the wolves, I agree. They are beautiful, intelligent, animals that mate for life and have strong family values. But left to propagate unattended they will follow the course of all species who find their numbers swelled to overpopulation. Mother nature introduces disease and starvation.” </p>
<p>Before we jump on the bandwagon and condemn the people of Alaska while sitting at computers in our urban homes, let us educate ourselves about the issues first</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
